QUANTITATIVE REVOLUTION AND LOCATIONAL ANALYSIS
QUANTITATIVE REVOLUTION AND LOCATIONAL ANALYSIS
QUANTITATIVE REVOLUTION
Definition: Application of statistical and mathematical techniques, theory in the understanding geographical system is known as the quantitative revolution in Geography.
- The quantitative revolution starts with Richard Hartshorne and Schaefer's debate in 1953
- It was inspired by Logical Possibilism.
It involved two things:
- A statistical method for generating and testing hypothesis using empirical data.
- Use of mathematical techniques and theorems for deriving models from initial abstract assumption.
Why it is called a revolution?
1. Because it involves a shift in focus of geographical studies and nature of geographical work.
2. New concepts of geography as a science of spatial analysis of phenomena, the idea of Geography our special science emerged.
3. Pronounced commitment to
Main objectives of quantitative revolution
1. Change the descriptive character of the subject and make it more scientific.
2. Provide Geography is a sound philosophical and theoretical base.
3. Explain and interpret spatial patterns of geographical phenomena in a rational, objective manner.
4. Test hypothesis and formulate models, theories and laws for Estimation and prediction.
5. Use of mathematical language.
6. Make a precise statement about Locational order.
Development
The origin of quantitative Revolution is dedicated to Schaefer in his workThree Major
2. William Bunge
3. Peter Haggett
Developments under quantitative revolution
1. Ullman's model of urban structure
2. Garrison's mathematical techniques
3. Stewarts empirical mathematical rules
4. G.K. Ziff's principle of least effort
5. Chorley and Haggett multivariate analysis
Advantages of the quantitative revolution
1. Sampling of data
2. Observation
3. Tabulation of data
4. Application of Statistical Techniques
Disadvantages of quantitative revolution
1. Could not explain anything about the normative approach
2. Financial burden because of scientific equipment.
3. Bunge criticism was given by Robert David Sack (space and matter cannot be analyzed separately, we need
Impact of quantitative Revolution on Geography
1. Quantitative Revolution developed as a result of the need to make Geography more scientific and theoretical in orientation.
2. The logical outgrowth of
3. It leads to shifting from descriptive geography (idiographic) to law-making (normative
4. It marked a change in geography from regional Geography to spatial science
5.
6. Quantitative Revolution
7. It served as an important tool for planning purpose.
8. It's failing
9. Because of quantitative revolution, the methodology was readily accepted into fields of physical geography to study of geomorphology, climatology, and Oceanography.
10. Quantitative Revolution helped to distinguish Geography from metaphysics and religion, it also provided with a sound philosophical scientific and methodological base.
11. It also leads to rising interest in the study of
12. Greater use of computer
Contribution in geography
1. Development of economic theories like The Locational theory and Central Place Theory.
2. Development of the concept of system approach in studying settlement, water cycle and the Rock cycle.
3. Contribution to Locational analysis.
Merits of the quantitative revolution
1. It is based on empirical observation and it is readily verifiable.
2. It helps in reducing the multitude of observation data and Facts to a manageable number of factors
3. It helps in estimation, prediction, and forecasting
4. It provides techniques, frameworks within which theoretical statement could be formally presented.
5. Objective measurement of data.
Demerits of quantitative revolution
1. Fail to address the entire field of geography, therefore, led to a decrease in the centrality of approach.
2. Dehumanization as human perception believes and fear is completely ignored. It gives it a generalized touch and forecast man as a rational economic creature.
3. Quantitative Revolution increases the need for funding in geography because of the use of instruments like golden calf computers GPS and GIS Technology.
LOCATIONAL ANALYSIS
It is based on the philosophy of logical positivism (Positivism is a set of philosophical approaches that seeks to apply scientific principles and methods, drawn from the natural and hard sciences to social phenomena in order to explain them. So in this way, it is a logical system that bases knowledge on direct, systematic observation.). It concentrates on the theories of spatial arrangements. So it is closely linked to the discipline of quantitative revolution. Geometry is used as a language for the study of spatial form.
Application of locational analysis
To select a site for
1. Business expansion
2. Facilitate relocation, supply chain analysis, trade area performance, assessment of shopping center.
The main objectives of locational analysis by Peter Haggett were:
1. Building accurate generalization models and theories.
2. Formulation of Universal law theories and models in human Geography about human behavior and how people utilize their resources.
The model is given by Peter Haggett
Peter Haggett in his booklocational analysis in human geography appeal to adopt geometric tradition to explain the order, locational order, and pattern in human geography. Such a focus needed
Peter Haggett in his book
1. To Adopt
2. To employee models to understand man environment relationship.
3. To use quantitative techniques to make precise statements and a generalization about
(Model of
Advantages of
1 better prediction
2. It talks more about regional synthesis than
3. It talked about how local
Disadvantages
1. It includes disadvantages of the quantitative revolution
2. Secondly, it gives too much emphasis onspace thus it follows the roots of capitalism
3. It encourages capitalism.
Criticism
1. It includes disadvantages of the quantitative revolution
2. Secondly, it gives too much emphasis on
3. It encourages capitalism.
Criticism
1. It ignores the normative question based on the mistaken belief that positive theory would lead to normative Insight.
2. It did not reflect the reality of
3. It considers the complexities of real-world
4. It is criticized on the ground that it encourages the social order of capitalism
5. Due to
6. It treats people as dots on a map a data on a graph on numbers in an equation
Impact
Substantially change the nature of human Geography from mid 1960
It helped in
Comments
Post a Comment